Pakistan vs Philippines
Per-capita emissions are higher in Philippines than in Pakistan: roughly ~0.8 tCO₂e/person/year more, or about 111% higher. Globally, Pakistan ranks around #53 and Philippines around #52 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.
CO₂ per capita
Lower is betterWorld median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year
Asia median: ~~6.7 tCO₂e/year
Consumption-based CO₂ per capita
Lower is betterWorld median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year
Asia median: ~~7.5 tCO₂e/year
Electricity carbon intensity
Lower is betterWorld median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh
Asia median: ~~561 gCO₂/kWh
Renewable electricity share
Higher is betterWorld median: ~~34%
Asia median: ~~16%
Key takeaways
Pakistan has much lower per-capita emissions and much lower consumption-based emissions while Philippines has much higher per-capita emissions and much higher consumption-based emissions.
Quick comparison
Philippines has higher per-capita emissions (~1.5 tCO₂e/person/year) than Pakistan (~0.7 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~-0.8 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 53% lower.
In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Pakistan stands around #53 and Philippines around #52.
Pakistan is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 85% below.
Philippines is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 68% below.
Within Asia, Pakistan sits below the regional median (~6.7 tCO₂e/person).
Within Asia, Philippines sits below the regional median (~6.7 tCO₂e/person).
Why the numbers can differ
GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.
Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.
Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.
How to interpret per-capita vs total
Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.
What would move the gap
Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:
- Switching to renewable electricity and heat pumps for heating
- Phasing out coal and fossil gas in power generation
- Reducing car use and choosing electric vehicles
- Cutting down on air travel and long-haul freight
- Shifting diets toward less carbon-intensive foods
- Electrifying industrial heating and process heat
- Improving industrial process efficiency
- Expanding public transit and active mobility
- Retrofitting older buildings with heat pumps
- Reducing food waste along the supply chain
Data sources
- CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2024, 2024)
- Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
- Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
- Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Pakistan or Philippines?
Philippines has higher per-capita emissions (~1.5 tCO₂e/person/year) than Pakistan (~0.7 tCO₂e/person/year).
How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?
Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.
How does Pakistan compare to the global median?
About 85% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.
How does Philippines compare to the global median?
About 68% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.
Does this include consumption-based emissions?
The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.
How often is this data updated?
Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.