Colombia vs Pakistan

Share / download

Per-capita emissions are higher in Colombia than in Pakistan: roughly ~1.0 tCO₂e/person/year more, or about 145% higher. Globally, Colombia ranks around #51 and Pakistan around #53 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Colombia ~1.8 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Pakistan. Pakistan ~0.7 tCO₂e/yearPakistan leads by 1 t (145%)
Colombia
~1.8 tCO₂e/year
Pakistan
~0.7 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Colombia ~2.0 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Pakistan. Pakistan ~0.9 tCO₂e/yearPakistan leads by 1.1 t (125%)
Colombia
~2.0 tCO₂e/year
Pakistan
~0.9 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Winner: Colombia. Colombia ~286 gCO₂/kWhPakistan ~398 gCO₂/kWhColombia leads by 112 g (39%)
Colombia
~286 gCO₂/kWh
Pakistan
~398 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Winner: Colombia. Colombia ~64%Pakistan ~33%Colombia leads by 31 pp
Colombia
~64%
Pakistan
~33%

World median: ~~34%

Key takeaways

Colombia has much higher per-capita emissions and much higher consumption-based emissions while Pakistan has much lower per-capita emissions and much lower consumption-based emissions.

Quick comparison

Colombia has higher per-capita emissions (~1.8 tCO₂e/person/year) than Pakistan (~0.7 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~1.0 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 145% higher.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Colombia stands around #51 and Pakistan around #53.

Colombia is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 63% below.

Pakistan is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 85% below.

Within South America, Colombia sits below the regional median (~2.3 tCO₂e/person).

Within Asia, Pakistan sits below the regional median (~6.7 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Supporting policies that phase out fossil fuels
  • Ensuring new infrastructure is low-carbon from the start
  • Expanding clean energy access without locking in fossil dependency
  • Avoiding high-emission development pathways
  • Building resilience while keeping emissions low

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2024, 2024)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Colombia or Pakistan?

Colombia has higher per-capita emissions (~1.8 tCO₂e/person/year) than Pakistan (~0.7 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Colombia compare to the global median?

About 63% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does Pakistan compare to the global median?

About 85% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.