Poland vs South Africa

Share / download

Poland emits more CO₂ per capita than South Africa by about ~0.2 tCO₂e/person/year (about 3% higher). Globally, Poland ranks around #14 and South Africa around #16 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Poland ~7.1 tCO₂e/yearWinner: South Africa. South Africa ~6.9 tCO₂e/yearSouth Africa leads by 0.2 t (3%)
Poland
~7.1 tCO₂e/year
South Africa
~6.9 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Poland ~7.1 tCO₂e/yearWinner: South Africa. South Africa ~5.1 tCO₂e/yearSouth Africa leads by 1.9 t (37%)
Poland
~7.1 tCO₂e/year
South Africa
~5.1 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Winner: Poland. Poland ~592 gCO₂/kWhSouth Africa ~713 gCO₂/kWhPoland leads by 121 g (20%)
Poland
~592 gCO₂/kWh
South Africa
~713 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Winner: Poland. Poland ~31%South Africa ~13%Poland leads by 18 pp
Poland
~31%
South Africa
~13%

World median: ~~34%

Key takeaways

Poland has much higher consumption-based emissions and a much higher renewable share while South Africa has much lower consumption-based emissions and much lower renewable share and similar per-capita emissions.

Quick comparison

Poland has higher per-capita emissions (~7.1 tCO₂e/person/year) than South Africa (~6.9 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~0.2 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 3% higher.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Poland stands around #14 and South Africa around #16.

Poland is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 49% above.

South Africa is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 45% above.

Within Europe, Poland sits above the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Within Africa, South Africa sits above the regional median (~1.8 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Cutting down on air travel and long-haul freight
  • Reducing car use and choosing electric vehicles
  • Phasing out coal and fossil gas in power generation
  • Increasing renewable share in electricity generation
  • Switching to renewable electricity and heat pumps for heating
  • Improving building insulation and energy efficiency
  • Retrofitting older buildings with heat pumps
  • Improving industrial process efficiency
  • Electrifying industrial heating and process heat
  • Shifting diets toward less carbon-intensive foods

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2025, 2024)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Poland or South Africa?

Poland has higher per-capita emissions (~7.1 tCO₂e/person/year) than South Africa (~6.9 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Poland compare to the global median?

About 49% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does South Africa compare to the global median?

About 45% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.