Finland vs Slovakia

Share / download

Per-capita emissions are higher in Finland than in Slovakia: roughly ~0.0 tCO₂e/person/year more, or about 0% higher. Globally, Finland ranks around #26 and Slovakia around #27 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Finland ~5.3 tCO₂e/yearSlovakia ~5.3 tCO₂e/yearSimilar
Finland
~5.3 tCO₂e/year
Slovakia
~5.3 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~5.3 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Finland ~8.5 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Slovakia. Slovakia ~6.3 tCO₂e/yearSlovakia leads by 2.1 t (33%)
Finland
~8.5 tCO₂e/year
Slovakia
~6.3 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~7.1 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Winner: Finland. Finland ~57 gCO₂/kWhSlovakia ~95 gCO₂/kWhFinland leads by 38 g (67%)
Finland
~57 gCO₂/kWh
Slovakia
~95 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Europe median: ~~190 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Winner: Finland. Finland ~56%Slovakia ~19%Finland leads by 37 pp
Finland
~56%
Slovakia
~19%

World median: ~~34%

Europe median: ~~49%

Key takeaways

Finland has a much higher renewable share and much higher consumption-based emissions while Slovakia has much lower renewable share and much lower consumption-based emissions and similar per-capita emissions.

Quick comparison

Finland has higher per-capita emissions (~5.3 tCO₂e/person/year) than Slovakia (~5.3 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~0.0 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 0% higher.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Finland stands around #26 and Slovakia around #27.

Finland is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 12% above.

Slovakia is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 11% above.

Within Europe, Finland sits close to the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Within Europe, Slovakia sits close to the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Ensuring new infrastructure is low-carbon from the start
  • Avoiding high-emission development pathways
  • Building resilience while keeping emissions low
  • Supporting policies that phase out fossil fuels
  • Expanding clean energy access without locking in fossil dependency

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2025, 2025)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Finland or Slovakia?

Finland has higher per-capita emissions (~5.3 tCO₂e/person/year) than Slovakia (~5.3 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Finland compare to the global median?

About 12% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does Slovakia compare to the global median?

About 11% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.