Bangladesh vs Nigeria

Share / download

The gap between Bangladesh and Nigeria is about ~0.0 tCO₂e/person/year per person per year (about 7% higher). Globally, Bangladesh ranks around #54 and Nigeria around #55 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Bangladesh ~0.6 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Nigeria. Nigeria ~0.6 tCO₂e/yearNigeria leads by 0 t (7%)
Bangladesh
~0.6 tCO₂e/year
Nigeria
~0.6 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Bangladesh ~1.0 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Nigeria. Nigeria ~0.6 tCO₂e/yearNigeria leads by 0.4 t (67%)
Bangladesh
~1.0 tCO₂e/year
Nigeria
~0.6 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Bangladesh ~694 gCO₂/kWhWinner: Nigeria. Nigeria ~508 gCO₂/kWhNigeria leads by 186 g (37%)
Bangladesh
~694 gCO₂/kWh
Nigeria
~508 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Bangladesh ~2%Winner: Nigeria. Nigeria ~23%Nigeria leads by 21 pp
Bangladesh
~2%
Nigeria
~23%

World median: ~~34%

Key takeaways

Bangladesh has much higher consumption-based emissions and much lower renewable share while Nigeria has much lower consumption-based emissions and a much higher renewable share and similar per-capita emissions.

Quick comparison

Bangladesh has higher per-capita emissions (~0.6 tCO₂e/person/year) than Nigeria (~0.6 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~0.0 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 7% higher.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Bangladesh stands around #54 and Nigeria around #55.

Bangladesh is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 87% below.

Nigeria is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 88% below.

Within Asia, Bangladesh sits below the regional median (~6.7 tCO₂e/person).

Within Africa, Nigeria sits below the regional median (~1.8 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Phasing out coal and fossil gas in power generation
  • Retrofitting older buildings with heat pumps
  • Cutting down on air travel and long-haul freight
  • Shifting diets toward less carbon-intensive foods
  • Improving industrial process efficiency
  • Improving building insulation and energy efficiency
  • Reducing car use and choosing electric vehicles
  • Reducing food waste along the supply chain
  • Switching to renewable electricity and heat pumps for heating
  • Expanding public transit and active mobility

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2024, 2024)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Bangladesh or Nigeria?

Bangladesh has higher per-capita emissions (~0.6 tCO₂e/person/year) than Nigeria (~0.6 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Bangladesh compare to the global median?

About 87% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does Nigeria compare to the global median?

About 88% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.