Argentina vs Thailand

Share / download

The gap between Argentina and Thailand is about ~0.0 tCO₂e/person/year per person per year (about 0% higher). Globally, Argentina ranks around #37 and Thailand around #38 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Argentina ~3.7 tCO₂e/yearThailand ~3.7 tCO₂e/yearSimilar
Argentina
~3.7 tCO₂e/year
Thailand
~3.7 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Winner: Argentina. Argentina ~4.1 tCO₂e/yearThailand ~4.3 tCO₂e/yearArgentina leads by 0.2 t (5%)
Argentina
~4.1 tCO₂e/year
Thailand
~4.3 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Winner: Argentina. Argentina ~345 gCO₂/kWhThailand ~555 gCO₂/kWhArgentina leads by 210 g (61%)
Argentina
~345 gCO₂/kWh
Thailand
~555 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Winner: Argentina. Argentina ~34%Thailand ~15%Argentina leads by 20 pp
Argentina
~34%
Thailand
~15%

World median: ~~34%

Key takeaways

Argentina has a much higher renewable share and cleaner electricity while Thailand has much lower renewable share and slightly higher grid intensity and similar consumption-based emissions and per-capita emissions.

Quick comparison

Argentina has higher per-capita emissions (~3.7 tCO₂e/person/year) than Thailand (~3.7 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~0.0 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 0% higher.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Argentina stands around #37 and Thailand around #38.

Argentina is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 21% below.

Thailand is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 21% below.

Within South America, Argentina sits above the regional median (~2.3 tCO₂e/person).

Within Asia, Thailand sits below the regional median (~6.7 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Ensuring new infrastructure is low-carbon from the start
  • Building resilience while keeping emissions low
  • Supporting policies that phase out fossil fuels
  • Expanding clean energy access without locking in fossil dependency
  • Avoiding high-emission development pathways

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2024, 2024)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Argentina or Thailand?

Argentina has higher per-capita emissions (~3.7 tCO₂e/person/year) than Thailand (~3.7 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Argentina compare to the global median?

About 21% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does Thailand compare to the global median?

About 21% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.