Norway vs Sweden

Share / download

The gap between Norway and Sweden is about ~3.1 tCO₂e/person/year per person per year (about 86% higher). Globally, Norway ranks around #18 and Sweden around #42 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Norway ~6.7 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Sweden. Sweden ~3.6 tCO₂e/yearSweden leads by 3.1 t (86%)
Norway
~6.7 tCO₂e/year
Sweden
~3.6 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~5.3 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Norway ~7.1 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Sweden. Sweden ~5.8 tCO₂e/yearSweden leads by 1.2 t (21%)
Norway
~7.1 tCO₂e/year
Sweden
~5.8 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~7.1 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Winner: Norway. Norway ~29 gCO₂/kWhSweden ~35 gCO₂/kWhNorway leads by 6 g (21%)
Norway
~29 gCO₂/kWh
Sweden
~35 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Europe median: ~~190 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Winner: Norway. Norway ~99%Sweden ~71%Norway leads by 28 pp
Norway
~99%
Sweden
~71%

World median: ~~34%

Europe median: ~~49%

Key takeaways

Norway has much higher per-capita emissions and a much higher renewable share while Sweden has much lower per-capita emissions and much lower renewable share.

Quick comparison

Norway has higher per-capita emissions (~6.7 tCO₂e/person/year) than Sweden (~3.6 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~3.1 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 86% higher.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Norway stands around #18 and Sweden around #42.

Norway is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 40% above.

Sweden is below the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 24% below.

Within Europe, Norway sits above the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Within Europe, Sweden sits below the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Shifting diets toward less carbon-intensive foods
  • Phasing out coal and fossil gas in power generation
  • Reducing car use and choosing electric vehicles
  • Retrofitting older buildings with heat pumps
  • Switching to renewable electricity and heat pumps for heating
  • Improving building insulation and energy efficiency
  • Reducing food waste along the supply chain
  • Electrifying industrial heating and process heat
  • Cutting down on air travel and long-haul freight
  • Expanding public transit and active mobility

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2025, 2025)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Norway or Sweden?

Norway has higher per-capita emissions (~6.7 tCO₂e/person/year) than Sweden (~3.6 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Norway compare to the global median?

About 40% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does Sweden compare to the global median?

About 24% below the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.