Belgium vs Russia

Share / download

Per-capita emissions are higher in Russia than in Belgium: roughly ~5.0 tCO₂e/person/year more, or about 69% higher. Globally, Belgium ranks around #13 and Russia around #6 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Winner: Belgium. Belgium ~7.3 tCO₂e/yearRussia ~12.3 tCO₂e/yearBelgium leads by 5 t (69%)
Belgium
~7.3 tCO₂e/year
Russia
~12.3 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~5.3 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Belgium ~16.8 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Russia. Russia ~9.7 tCO₂e/yearRussia leads by 7.1 t (74%)
Belgium
~16.8 tCO₂e/year
Russia
~9.7 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~7.1 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Winner: Belgium. Belgium ~150 gCO₂/kWhRussia ~446 gCO₂/kWhBelgium leads by 296 g (198%)
Belgium
~150 gCO₂/kWh
Russia
~446 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Europe median: ~~190 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Winner: Belgium. Belgium ~39%Russia ~18%Belgium leads by 21 pp
Belgium
~39%
Russia
~18%

World median: ~~34%

Europe median: ~~49%

Key takeaways

Belgium has much higher consumption-based emissions and much lower per-capita emissions while Russia has much lower consumption-based emissions and much higher per-capita emissions.

Quick comparison

Russia has higher per-capita emissions (~12.3 tCO₂e/person/year) than Belgium (~7.3 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~-5.0 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 41% lower.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Belgium stands around #13 and Russia around #6.

Belgium is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 53% above.

Russia is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 159% above.

Within Europe, Belgium sits above the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Within Europe, Russia sits above the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Improving building insulation and energy efficiency
  • Reducing car use and choosing electric vehicles
  • Cutting down on air travel and long-haul freight
  • Increasing renewable share in electricity generation
  • Phasing out coal and fossil gas in power generation
  • Electrifying industrial heating and process heat
  • Shifting diets toward less carbon-intensive foods
  • Improving industrial process efficiency
  • Reducing food waste along the supply chain
  • Retrofitting older buildings with heat pumps

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2025, 2024)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Belgium or Russia?

Russia has higher per-capita emissions (~12.3 tCO₂e/person/year) than Belgium (~7.3 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Belgium compare to the global median?

About 53% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does Russia compare to the global median?

About 159% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.