Austria vs Norway

Share / download

The gap between Norway and Austria is about ~0.5 tCO₂e/person/year per person per year (about 8% higher). Globally, Austria ranks around #22 and Norway around #18 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Winner: Austria. Austria ~6.2 tCO₂e/yearNorway ~6.7 tCO₂e/yearAustria leads by 0.5 t (8%)
Austria
~6.2 tCO₂e/year
Norway
~6.7 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~5.3 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Austria ~8.4 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Norway. Norway ~7.1 tCO₂e/yearNorway leads by 1.3 t (19%)
Austria
~8.4 tCO₂e/year
Norway
~7.1 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~7.1 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Austria ~114 gCO₂/kWhWinner: Norway. Norway ~29 gCO₂/kWhNorway leads by 85 g (291%)
Austria
~114 gCO₂/kWh
Norway
~29 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Europe median: ~~190 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Austria ~84%Winner: Norway. Norway ~99%Norway leads by 15 pp
Austria
~84%
Norway
~99%

World median: ~~34%

Europe median: ~~49%

Key takeaways

Austria has slightly higher consumption-based emissions and slightly lower renewable share while Norway has lower consumption-based emissions and a higher renewable share and similar per-capita emissions.

Quick comparison

Norway has higher per-capita emissions (~6.7 tCO₂e/person/year) than Austria (~6.2 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~-0.5 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 7% lower.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Austria stands around #22 and Norway around #18.

Austria is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 30% above.

Norway is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 40% above.

Within Europe, Austria sits above the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Within Europe, Norway sits above the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Increasing renewable share in electricity generation
  • Phasing out coal and fossil gas in power generation
  • Reducing car use and choosing electric vehicles
  • Improving industrial process efficiency
  • Shifting diets toward less carbon-intensive foods
  • Electrifying industrial heating and process heat
  • Retrofitting older buildings with heat pumps
  • Cutting down on air travel and long-haul freight
  • Improving building insulation and energy efficiency
  • Reducing food waste along the supply chain

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2025, 2025)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Austria or Norway?

Norway has higher per-capita emissions (~6.7 tCO₂e/person/year) than Austria (~6.2 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Austria compare to the global median?

About 30% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does Norway compare to the global median?

About 40% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.