Austria vs Finland

Share / download

Per-capita emissions are higher in Austria than in Finland: roughly ~0.9 tCO₂e/person/year more, or about 17% higher. Globally, Austria ranks around #22 and Finland around #26 by CO₂ per capita. Both can be compared to the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Austria ~6.2 tCO₂e/yearWinner: Finland. Finland ~5.3 tCO₂e/yearFinland leads by 0.9 t (17%)
Austria
~6.2 tCO₂e/year
Finland
~5.3 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~4.7 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~5.3 tCO₂e/year

Consumption-based CO₂ per capita

Lower is better
Winner: Austria. Austria ~8.4 tCO₂e/yearFinland ~8.5 tCO₂e/yearAustria leads by 0.1 t (1%)
Austria
~8.4 tCO₂e/year
Finland
~8.5 tCO₂e/year

World median: ~~6.5 tCO₂e/year

Europe median: ~~7.1 tCO₂e/year

Electricity carbon intensity

Lower is better
Austria ~114 gCO₂/kWhWinner: Finland. Finland ~57 gCO₂/kWhFinland leads by 57 g (101%)
Austria
~114 gCO₂/kWh
Finland
~57 gCO₂/kWh

World median: ~~345 gCO₂/kWh

Europe median: ~~190 gCO₂/kWh

Renewable electricity share

Higher is better
Winner: Austria. Austria ~84%Finland ~56%Austria leads by 28 pp
Austria
~84%
Finland
~56%

World median: ~~34%

Europe median: ~~49%

Key takeaways

Austria has a much higher renewable share and slightly higher per-capita emissions while Finland has much lower renewable share and lower per-capita emissions and similar consumption-based emissions.

Quick comparison

Austria has higher per-capita emissions (~6.2 tCO₂e/person/year) than Finland (~5.3 tCO₂e/person/year). The difference is about ~0.9 tCO₂e/person/year, or about 17% higher.

In the global ranking by CO₂ per capita, Austria stands around #22 and Finland around #26.

Austria is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 30% above.

Finland is above the global median (~4.7 tCO₂e/person), about 12% above.

Within Europe, Austria sits above the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Within Europe, Finland sits close to the regional median (~5.3 tCO₂e/person).

Why the numbers can differ

GDP per capita often correlates with energy use: higher incomes tend to mean more transport, heating, and consumption. The relationship is not fixed—policy, energy mix, and urban design can decouple emissions from economic activity.

Urbanization affects transport patterns and building energy use. Denser cities can support public transit and district heating; sprawl tends to increase car dependency and per-capita emissions.

Electricity carbon intensity and the share of renewables in the power mix influence how much emissions drop when transport and heating electrify. Cleaner grids amplify the benefit of electric vehicles and heat pumps.

How to interpret per-capita vs total

Per-capita emissions divide a country's total CO₂ output by its population. That lets us compare nations fairly regardless of size. A large country with high total emissions can still have low per-person emissions if its population is very large. Total emissions matter for the global climate, but per-capita figures help us understand lifestyle and policy differences between countries.

What would move the gap

Targeted actions depend on each country's starting point. Levers that can narrow or reverse the gap include:

  • Increasing renewable share in electricity generation
  • Reducing car use and choosing electric vehicles
  • Retrofitting older buildings with heat pumps
  • Phasing out coal and fossil gas in power generation
  • Electrifying industrial heating and process heat
  • Improving industrial process efficiency
  • Expanding public transit and active mobility
  • Reducing food waste along the supply chain
  • Switching to renewable electricity and heat pumps for heating
  • Cutting down on air travel and long-haul freight

Data sources

  • CO₂ per capita, territorial emissions: OWID (2025, 2025)
  • Electricity carbon intensity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Renewables share of electricity: OWID / Ember (latest available)
  • Ember: electricity mix, carbon intensity

Related comparisons

CO₂ per capita rankings · All countries

Frequently asked questions

Which country has higher CO2 per capita: Austria or Finland?

Austria has higher per-capita emissions (~6.2 tCO₂e/person/year) than Finland (~5.3 tCO₂e/person/year).

How do per-capita emissions differ from total emissions?

Per-capita emissions divide total national emissions by population, allowing fair comparison across countries of different sizes. Total emissions matter for global impact; per-capita figures help compare lifestyle and policy.

How does Austria compare to the global median?

About 30% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

How does Finland compare to the global median?

About 12% above the global median of ~4.7 tCO₂e per person.

Does this include consumption-based emissions?

The main figure is territorial (production-based). We also show consumption-based CO₂ per capita when available, which counts emissions embedded in imported goods.

How often is this data updated?

Data comes from Our World in Data, World Bank, and Ember. Coverage and latest year vary by metric.